Soft/benchmark/hard, some combinations make no sense. Note also that whilst you can combine these with Won't appear, regardless of whether it is in reality over or undergraded. Note that this is based on votes, so if there are no votes for a route and you include one of these Marked as soft, and not check the other fields for the text.Ī continuation of this system which uses the same syntax allows you to search for routes that are voted to be a completelyĭifferent grade using the following criteria:Įg |overgraded|. The text appeared in the description for example and |soft| will only match against routes that have been The text in pipes, you'll just be searching the other text fields, so soft, with no pipes, would get you a match if You can search for routes with these characteristics by using the special pipe-syntax, eg |soft|. We've calculated a value based on the grade voting system that assigns a route a value from one of: You should note that not all routes have had the first ascent date filled in, and these routes willĮxcluded from any search that includes date ranges, so you might not get the results you expect. Eg vs-e1 will match routes with a grade of either VS,ĭate ranges will check against the first-ascent date field and require the route to have been put up between the start date and Or more stars that also match the other search criteria bat and route.Īdding a dash and a second star sequence will create a range, eg *-** means 'match routes with at least one andĪs above with stars, but with grades. Search where the route is required to have at least that many stars, eg bat route ** will only return routes with

Treated as 1-star, ** treated as 2-stars and *** treated as 3-stars. A sequence of them is considered to be a star rating for a route, so Surround multiple words with double quotes to require a match on that phrase, eg 'bat route' malham Route-star rangesĪsterisks get special treatment in search queries.

Muffin knight cyclops